We use analytics (Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity) to improve content and user experience. Partner introductions may be compensated.

Privacy · Disclosure

Data

Data quality ownership model for ERP programmes

Published 01-Mar-2026

2 min read Updated 01-Mar-2026
Reviewed by ERP Search editorial team Last reviewed 01-Mar-2026 Independent buyer guidance for growing businesses
Data stewards validating records and governance standards on screens
Data quality improves when ownership moves from abstract policy into named business roles.

Editorial context

Category
Data
Role
Top-of-funnel trust + newsletter content
Next step
Link to related guide or comparison page

A practical operating model to assign data ownership and reduce migration defects.

Data quality is a business accountability supported by technology, not an IT-only task.

Assign data stewards by domain and require measurable quality thresholds.

Track defects to source process owners to prevent recurrence.

Why this matters

  • Data quality improves when ownership is attached to business outcomes such as credit accuracy, inventory trust, supplier readiness, and reporting confidence.
  • A data operating model should define who approves standards, who fixes defects, and how exceptions are escalated.
  • Migration defects are often symptoms of weak source process discipline, so the goal is not just cleansing but prevention.

What to check in practice

  • Data quality is a business accountability supported by technology, not an IT-only task.
  • Assign data stewards by domain and require measurable quality thresholds.
  • Track defects to source process owners to prevent recurrence.

Mistakes that create avoidable project pain

  • Confusing software functionality with business readiness.
  • Assuming a partner or vendor will solve unclear process ownership for you.
  • Treating post-selection execution risks as someone else’s problem.

What to do next

  • Translate the key points into a shortlist scorecard, project risk log, or operating checklist the team can use immediately.
  • Use the article to shape the next vendor demo, partner workshop, or internal decision forum rather than leaving it as passive research.
  • Pair this article with a relevant guide or comparison page before final decisions are made.